<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ArtFlock aims to disrupt gallery monopoly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/artflock-aims-to-disrupt-gallery-monopoly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/artflock-aims-to-disrupt-gallery-monopoly/</link>
	<description>Tracking the UK's mobile and web start-up ecosystem.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 03:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: msn</title>
		<link>http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/artflock-aims-to-disrupt-gallery-monopoly/#comment-76225</link>
		<dc:creator>msn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/artflock-aims-to-disrupt-gallery-monopoly/#comment-76225</guid>
		<description>thaks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thaks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jof Arnold</title>
		<link>http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/artflock-aims-to-disrupt-gallery-monopoly/#comment-34870</link>
		<dc:creator>Jof Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 22:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/artflock-aims-to-disrupt-gallery-monopoly/#comment-34870</guid>
		<description>The problem artists will have with this it is that conventionally the reason (other than greed) gallery owners take such a high commission is because of huge amount of work involved in promoting artists to the right buyers.  

A website like this will presumably be far less hands-on - consequently the cynic in me sees this site as a kind of "expensive etsy", where anything that matches the color of someone's curtains sells well and serious art doesn't.  That's not to say that's not a bad thing (provided it makes money), but if that's the case then, as Travis points out, the competition is fierce and, worse still, is FREE to the artists.

By the way, my first startup was in this space... it didn't work out. lol :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem artists will have with this it is that conventionally the reason (other than greed) gallery owners take such a high commission is because of huge amount of work involved in promoting artists to the right buyers.  </p>
<p>A website like this will presumably be far less hands-on - consequently the cynic in me sees this site as a kind of &#8220;expensive etsy&#8221;, where anything that matches the color of someone&#8217;s curtains sells well and serious art doesn&#8217;t.  That&#8217;s not to say that&#8217;s not a bad thing (provided it makes money), but if that&#8217;s the case then, as Travis points out, the competition is fierce and, worse still, is FREE to the artists.</p>
<p>By the way, my first startup was in this space&#8230; it didn&#8217;t work out. lol <img src='http://uk.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/artflock-aims-to-disrupt-gallery-monopoly/#comment-34434</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 18:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/artflock-aims-to-disrupt-gallery-monopoly/#comment-34434</guid>
		<description>Well, it is impressive what Ed has done on his own, but I think this site is missing the boat a little, at least in the sales area.  Places like Imagekind are already way ahead of everyone in changing selling game for artists (giving them an even better percentage -100% - than Artflock).  As well, original artwork is being sold in droves on places like Etsy, for the same kind of return.

However, Artflock does have some valuable tools that could be expanded for an overall artist promotion and management functionality for artists.  Features like Artflock's "Stockist" are intriguing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it is impressive what Ed has done on his own, but I think this site is missing the boat a little, at least in the sales area.  Places like Imagekind are already way ahead of everyone in changing selling game for artists (giving them an even better percentage -100% - than Artflock).  As well, original artwork is being sold in droves on places like Etsy, for the same kind of return.</p>
<p>However, Artflock does have some valuable tools that could be expanded for an overall artist promotion and management functionality for artists.  Features like Artflock&#8217;s &#8220;Stockist&#8221; are intriguing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.052 seconds -->
