<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Testcard.tv taken down as Police swoop on TV-Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/</link>
	<description>Tracking the UK's mobile and web start-up ecosystem.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 04:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch UK &#187; Blog Archive &#187; TVCatchup on hold after broadcasters weigh in</title>
		<link>http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-115489</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch UK &#187; Blog Archive &#187; TVCatchup on hold after broadcasters weigh in</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-115489</guid>
		<description>[...] for these sites does not look good. Testcard.tv is still &#8216;on hold&#8217; after voluntarily shuttering its service in response to a Police raid on TV Links. Testcard.tv, put up by the owners of etribes drew heavily [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for these sites does not look good. Testcard.tv is still &#8216;on hold&#8217; after voluntarily shuttering its service in response to a Police raid on TV Links. Testcard.tv, put up by the owners of etribes drew heavily [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene</title>
		<link>http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-69343</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 18:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-69343</guid>
		<description>Interview with Mike Dixon of testcard.tv

http://uk.intruders.tv/Mike-Dixon-of-testcard-tv-the-controversial-TV-aggregator_a235.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interview with Mike Dixon of testcard.tv</p>
<p><a href="http://uk.intruders.tv/Mike-Dixon-of-testcard-tv-the-controversial-TV-aggregator_a235.html" rel="nofollow">http://uk.intruders.tv/Mike-Dixon-of-testcard-tv-the-controversial-TV-aggregator_a235.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlotte Berry</title>
		<link>http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-47623</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlotte Berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 08:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-47623</guid>
		<description>Here is a link to an interesting article from the Guardian about the billion dollar lawsuit that was filed by the owners of MTV and Comedy Central accusing Youtube of encouraging users to pirate copyright material. I imagine that a similar case in the UK is not too far away.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/aug/15/google.youtube</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a link to an interesting article from the Guardian about the billion dollar lawsuit that was filed by the owners of MTV and Comedy Central accusing Youtube of encouraging users to pirate copyright material. I imagine that a similar case in the UK is not too far away.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/aug/15/google.youtube" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/aug/15/google.youtube</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlotte Berry</title>
		<link>http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-47161</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlotte Berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-47161</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I am really disappointed at what has happened with the closure of uk based aggravators such as TV-LINKS and ProjectFreeTv. Also, both sbwebspace.com and Testcard.tv have supspened their services. However, there is one site that appears to be UK based and continuing on regardless. www.tv-video.net/ appears to both upload and host their videos and they reckon they do not support the violation of copyright because their videos are low resolution. Who are they trying kid? It is one of the most flimsy disclaimers you will ever come across. To become a VIP member of their site to get better quality videos you have to make a donation and I imagine that they are making a fair bit of money while a site like TV Links has bit the dust. There seems to be a complate lack of fairness in this copyright issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I am really disappointed at what has happened with the closure of uk based aggravators such as TV-LINKS and ProjectFreeTv. Also, both sbwebspace.com and Testcard.tv have supspened their services. However, there is one site that appears to be UK based and continuing on regardless. <a href="http://www.tv-video.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tv-video.net/</a> appears to both upload and host their videos and they reckon they do not support the violation of copyright because their videos are low resolution. Who are they trying kid? It is one of the most flimsy disclaimers you will ever come across. To become a VIP member of their site to get better quality videos you have to make a donation and I imagine that they are making a fair bit of money while a site like TV Links has bit the dust. There seems to be a complate lack of fairness in this copyright issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch UK &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Another site busted by the Brits. It makes you proud</title>
		<link>http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-46634</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch UK &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Another site busted by the Brits. It makes you proud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-46634</guid>
		<description>[...] has been closed and a 24-year old man from Middlesborough arrested. Well, it makes a change from arresting 26 year old men from Cheltenham. They do say a change is as good as a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has been closed and a 24-year old man from Middlesborough arrested. Well, it makes a change from arresting 26 year old men from Cheltenham. They do say a change is as good as a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Campbell</title>
		<link>http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-46532</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 10:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-46532</guid>
		<description>I thought this might be of interest. It comes from the press release pages on veoh.com (http://www.veoh.com/corporate/aboutUs.html). Veoh like Dailymotion.com, hosted many of the videos linked to www.tv-links.co.uk, and both sites are involved in the press release. 

Press Releases
Internet and Media Industry Leaders Unveil Principles to Foster Online Innovation While Protecting Copyrights


October 18, 2007

Several of the world's leading Internet and media companies today announced their joint support for a set of collaborative principles that enable the continued growth and development of user-generated content online and respect the intellectual property of content owners.

The principles serve as a comprehensive set of guidelines to help user-generated content (UGC) services and content creators work together towards their collective goal of bringing more content to more consumers through legitimate channels. The principles acknowledge a collective respect for protecting copyrights and recognize that filtering technologies must be effective and are only a part of what is necessary to achieve this goal.

The companies supporting these principles include CBS Corp., Dailymotion, Fox Entertainment Group, Microsoft Corp., MySpace, NBC Universal, Veoh Networks Inc., Viacom Inc. and The Walt Disney Company.

The principles, which are attached and available in full at www.ugcprinciples.com, call for a broad range of constructive and cooperative efforts by copyright owners and UGC services. They include: 

Implementation of state of the art filtering technology with the goal to eliminate infringing content on UGC services, including blocking infringing uploads before they are made available to the public; 
Upgrading technology when commercially reasonable; 
Cooperating to ensure that the technology is implemented in a manner that effectively balances legitimate interests, including fair use; 
Cooperation in developing procedures for promptly addressing claims that content was blocked in error; 
Regularly using the technology to remove infringing content that was uploaded before the technology could block it; 
Identification and removal of links to sites that are clearly dedicated to, and predominantly used for, the dissemination of infringing content; and, 
Promotion of content-rich, infringement-free services by continuing to cooperatively test new technologies and by collaboratively updating these principles as appropriate to keep current with evolving developments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this might be of interest. It comes from the press release pages on veoh.com (http://www.veoh.com/corporate/aboutUs.html). Veoh like Dailymotion.com, hosted many of the videos linked to <a href="http://www.tv-links.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.tv-links.co.uk</a>, and both sites are involved in the press release. </p>
<p>Press Releases<br />
Internet and Media Industry Leaders Unveil Principles to Foster Online Innovation While Protecting Copyrights</p>
<p>October 18, 2007</p>
<p>Several of the world&#8217;s leading Internet and media companies today announced their joint support for a set of collaborative principles that enable the continued growth and development of user-generated content online and respect the intellectual property of content owners.</p>
<p>The principles serve as a comprehensive set of guidelines to help user-generated content (UGC) services and content creators work together towards their collective goal of bringing more content to more consumers through legitimate channels. The principles acknowledge a collective respect for protecting copyrights and recognize that filtering technologies must be effective and are only a part of what is necessary to achieve this goal.</p>
<p>The companies supporting these principles include CBS Corp., Dailymotion, Fox Entertainment Group, Microsoft Corp., MySpace, NBC Universal, Veoh Networks Inc., Viacom Inc. and The Walt Disney Company.</p>
<p>The principles, which are attached and available in full at <a href="http://www.ugcprinciples.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ugcprinciples.com</a>, call for a broad range of constructive and cooperative efforts by copyright owners and UGC services. They include: </p>
<p>Implementation of state of the art filtering technology with the goal to eliminate infringing content on UGC services, including blocking infringing uploads before they are made available to the public;<br />
Upgrading technology when commercially reasonable;<br />
Cooperating to ensure that the technology is implemented in a manner that effectively balances legitimate interests, including fair use;<br />
Cooperation in developing procedures for promptly addressing claims that content was blocked in error;<br />
Regularly using the technology to remove infringing content that was uploaded before the technology could block it;<br />
Identification and removal of links to sites that are clearly dedicated to, and predominantly used for, the dissemination of infringing content; and,<br />
Promotion of content-rich, infringement-free services by continuing to cooperatively test new technologies and by collaboratively updating these principles as appropriate to keep current with evolving developments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-46239</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-46239</guid>
		<description>Gary,
I admire the spirit.
Can you contact me - simon [at] testcard.tv

Take a look at www.testcard.tv too.

Thanks
Simon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary,<br />
I admire the spirit.<br />
Can you contact me - simon [at] testcard.tv</p>
<p>Take a look at <a href="http://www.testcard.tv" rel="nofollow">http://www.testcard.tv</a> too.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Simon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-46228</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-46228</guid>
		<description>The UK tech industry should be ashamed of itself.  If this was a site anywhere else the tech industry would have plastered this news all over the front pages on most news and blog sites.

Lets face it, tv-links.co.uk was the UK startup industry's best star, position 182 in Alexa ranks, other than Bebo what UK startup has managed that?

The UK tech industry should be supporting tv-links.co.uk 100%, whether they are doing something illegal or not.  They has not been found guilty YET.  However, if the UK tech industry does not rally support for these types of cases, we will our ability to compete in the Internet landscape slowly being eroded away.  This could be a landmark case and any person in the UK industry should be supporting and watching the proceedings.

There should be fair and proportional representation, tv-links.co.uk should have the best possible legal support in this issue, not to necessarily get them off the hook, but more importantly to ensure that legal precedents pushed through under the industry's nose.  Any legal UK precedents that are set in the Internet sphere should be of interest to all of the UK IT industry.

Unfortunately, there is not a great deal of substantial of validate detail surrounding this case, so the picture of what is actually happening in not totally clear.  I have emailled FACT but as of yet have heard nothing back yet.

What is needed is this case is the UK industry to support tv-links.co.uk and ensure that any that legal action that is undertaken is done so fairly and legal precedent is not set that may come back to bite the UK industry in the future.

It is hard to see how UK enterpernuers will be able to compete in the Internet landscape if the playing field is not level.  Perhaps FACT has not carried out similar operations on Google's UK operation or youtube as they would have an extensive legal battle on their hands, with almost unlimited resources fighting it.

We have started a ChipIn to raise money for tv-links.co.uk legal defense, unfortunately we have only raised $110 so far, hopefully the UK tech industry will realise that we had better start taking an interest in our fellow UK startup issues, because if we do not, they may be ours at some point.

http://humanopinion.org/support_for_tvlinks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UK tech industry should be ashamed of itself.  If this was a site anywhere else the tech industry would have plastered this news all over the front pages on most news and blog sites.</p>
<p>Lets face it, tv-links.co.uk was the UK startup industry&#8217;s best star, position 182 in Alexa ranks, other than Bebo what UK startup has managed that?</p>
<p>The UK tech industry should be supporting tv-links.co.uk 100%, whether they are doing something illegal or not.  They has not been found guilty YET.  However, if the UK tech industry does not rally support for these types of cases, we will our ability to compete in the Internet landscape slowly being eroded away.  This could be a landmark case and any person in the UK industry should be supporting and watching the proceedings.</p>
<p>There should be fair and proportional representation, tv-links.co.uk should have the best possible legal support in this issue, not to necessarily get them off the hook, but more importantly to ensure that legal precedents pushed through under the industry&#8217;s nose.  Any legal UK precedents that are set in the Internet sphere should be of interest to all of the UK IT industry.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, there is not a great deal of substantial of validate detail surrounding this case, so the picture of what is actually happening in not totally clear.  I have emailled FACT but as of yet have heard nothing back yet.</p>
<p>What is needed is this case is the UK industry to support tv-links.co.uk and ensure that any that legal action that is undertaken is done so fairly and legal precedent is not set that may come back to bite the UK industry in the future.</p>
<p>It is hard to see how UK enterpernuers will be able to compete in the Internet landscape if the playing field is not level.  Perhaps FACT has not carried out similar operations on Google&#8217;s UK operation or youtube as they would have an extensive legal battle on their hands, with almost unlimited resources fighting it.</p>
<p>We have started a ChipIn to raise money for tv-links.co.uk legal defense, unfortunately we have only raised $110 so far, hopefully the UK tech industry will realise that we had better start taking an interest in our fellow UK startup issues, because if we do not, they may be ours at some point.</p>
<p><a href="http://humanopinion.org/support_for_tvlinks" rel="nofollow">http://humanopinion.org/support_for_tvlinks</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Campbell</title>
		<link>http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-46203</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-46203</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I often help to administer on a uk based sight which offered links to films and television on sites such Youtube, Veoh and tudou. From today my fellow administrators will be removing these links after taking legal advice. However, it was the opinion of the business law experts that they saw that FACT will struggle to actually prosecute the owner of TV-Links, especially as there are rumours that Google will offer legal help. The loss of TV-links is a sad day for those of us who thought we had some decent freedom on the web.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I often help to administer on a uk based sight which offered links to films and television on sites such Youtube, Veoh and tudou. From today my fellow administrators will be removing these links after taking legal advice. However, it was the opinion of the business law experts that they saw that FACT will struggle to actually prosecute the owner of TV-Links, especially as there are rumours that Google will offer legal help. The loss of TV-links is a sad day for those of us who thought we had some decent freedom on the web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sasha</title>
		<link>http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-46173</link>
		<dc:creator>sasha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-46173</guid>
		<description>I used Tv Links to watch Prison Break as I don't have sky,not everyone can afford sky.Now I will have to wait a year until season 3 comes out on dvd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used Tv Links to watch Prison Break as I don&#8217;t have sky,not everyone can afford sky.Now I will have to wait a year until season 3 comes out on dvd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-46044</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 02:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-46044</guid>
		<description>This is B.S. So we can't watch classic tv shows and movies "legally" by purchasing them on dvd because they won't re-release a lot of them, and now we can't watch them on the one website that had them to watch for free. I guess we all have to just give up on the classics and let them die with our past generations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is B.S. So we can&#8217;t watch classic tv shows and movies &#8220;legally&#8221; by purchasing them on dvd because they won&#8217;t re-release a lot of them, and now we can&#8217;t watch them on the one website that had them to watch for free. I guess we all have to just give up on the classics and let them die with our past generations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-45994</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-45994</guid>
		<description>Mike - Testcard TV is hosting a conversation on the Testcard TV Blog.

http://blog.testcard.tv/

Should online tv aggregators be illegal?

Your readers are more than welcome to join us there as we'd very much value an informed debate.

Thanks
Simon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike - Testcard TV is hosting a conversation on the Testcard TV Blog.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.testcard.tv/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.testcard.tv/</a></p>
<p>Should online tv aggregators be illegal?</p>
<p>Your readers are more than welcome to join us there as we&#8217;d very much value an informed debate.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Simon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-45986</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-45986</guid>
		<description>At this time, Google has around 8,000 pages from TV-Links indexed _and_ cached.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At this time, Google has around 8,000 pages from TV-Links indexed _and_ cached.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-45971</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-45971</guid>
		<description>Thanks - the headline is still a little misleading but appreciate the update.

Simon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks - the headline is still a little misleading but appreciate the update.</p>
<p>Simon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Butcher</title>
		<link>http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-45970</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Butcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-45970</guid>
		<description>Simon Grice - I have updated the story to include Testcard's clarification.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon Grice - I have updated the story to include Testcard&#8217;s clarification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-45961</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 19:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-45961</guid>
		<description>Hi - I'm an investor in Testcard Limited - the company behind the www.testcard.tv service. 

To clarity the situation - testcard.tv has NOT been taken down by the police. No communications have been received by Testcard Limited from the police or any authority.

Testcard Limited has made a decision, following news that a similar service in the UK has been taken down by authorities, that as it wishes to operate within the framework of UK law it will operate the testcard.tv in an 'Under Maintenance' mode until there is further clarity on that framework.

For more information please see http://www.testcard.tv/

Thanks,
Simon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi - I&#8217;m an investor in Testcard Limited - the company behind the <a href="http://www.testcard.tv" rel="nofollow">http://www.testcard.tv</a> service. </p>
<p>To clarity the situation - testcard.tv has NOT been taken down by the police. No communications have been received by Testcard Limited from the police or any authority.</p>
<p>Testcard Limited has made a decision, following news that a similar service in the UK has been taken down by authorities, that as it wishes to operate within the framework of UK law it will operate the testcard.tv in an &#8216;Under Maintenance&#8217; mode until there is further clarity on that framework.</p>
<p>For more information please see <a href="http://www.testcard.tv/" rel="nofollow">http://www.testcard.tv/</a></p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Simon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch UK &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Tioti.com wins &#8217;seven figures&#8217; from Pond</title>
		<link>http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-45959</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch UK &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Tioti.com wins &#8217;seven figures&#8217; from Pond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 19:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-45959</guid>
		<description>[...] TC40    &#171; Previous episode [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TC40    &laquo; Previous episode [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie Anderson</title>
		<link>http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-45952</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 18:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-45952</guid>
		<description>I'm sure he can afford his own bail. The site was probably getting a stunning amount of traffic and thus ad revenue.

Seems a bit of a lame excuse to point his finger at youtube and google. They might be hosting some of the videos, but it's not as if they're pro-actively facilitating piracy like him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure he can afford his own bail. The site was probably getting a stunning amount of traffic and thus ad revenue.</p>
<p>Seems a bit of a lame excuse to point his finger at youtube and google. They might be hosting some of the videos, but it&#8217;s not as if they&#8217;re pro-actively facilitating piracy like him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candy  Matterson</title>
		<link>http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-45943</link>
		<dc:creator>Candy  Matterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 16:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-45943</guid>
		<description>Yep. I think we owe the poor guy who was arrested a drink,or a collection for his bail. I was keeping up to date with shows I had missed on TV. I am really sorry for him he was a gent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep. I think we owe the poor guy who was arrested a drink,or a collection for his bail. I was keeping up to date with shows I had missed on TV. I am really sorry for him he was a gent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Pope</title>
		<link>http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-45898</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Pope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 10:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uk.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/testcardtv-taken-down-as-police-swoop-on-tv-links/#comment-45898</guid>
		<description>Good grief - the shame of it. Plod strikes again in the service of the corportes, and misses the target. Anyone forming up a support group?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good grief - the shame of it. Plod strikes again in the service of the corportes, and misses the target. Anyone forming up a support group?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.106 seconds -->
